法律英语精读教程
全新正版 极速发货
￥ 39.93 6.1折 ￥ 65 全新
库存12件
广东广州
认证卖家担保交易快速发货售后保障
作者张法连 著
出版社北京大学出版社
ISBN9787301281451
出版时间2017-04
装帧平装
开本16开
定价65元
货号1201505145
上书时间2024-11-15
商品详情
- 品相描述：全新
- 商品描述
-
作者简介
张法连，1969年1月生，山东聊城人，中国政法大学外国语学院教授、硕士生导师，并在多所高校兼职博导，全国法律英语学科知名教授。
目录
Part Two Required ReadingsPart Three Optional Readings
内容摘要
《法律英语精读教程》讲述了随着我国入世和世界经济一体化进程的不断加快，靠前交流合作日益增多，涉外法务活动少见频繁，法律英语的重要性日益凸显。掌握专业英语已经成为现代法律人推荐的职业素质。由于法律英语的特殊性，靠前一直没有一个科学的考核指标衡量法律从业人员专业英语的掌握程度。法律英语证书（LEC）全国统一考试的推出为我国法律英语的教与学指明了方向，意义重大、影响深远。
主编推荐
《法律英语精读教程(下)》：法律英语证书（LEC）全国统一考试参考用书。
精彩内容
Third Period: Growth of Equity (1485-1832) (1) Emergence of Equity The strict compliance with formalist procedure exposed the common law to two dangers: that of not developing with sufficient freedom to meet the needs of the period and that the dangers of becoming paralyzed because of the conservatism of the legal world of the time. Unfortunately, these shortcomings of the royal courts could not be rectified or corrected by other courts that had general jurisdiction, for these courts were themselves in decline and gradually disappeared from the scene. The situation led to the eventuality that in a number of cases, no just solution could be found. In seeking another way of obtaining redress, a direct appeal to the King, the fountain of all justice and favor, was the logical and natural option. In cases of no solution or shocking solution, people addressed the King ask him to intervene as an act of royal grace to satisfy conscience and as a work of brotherly love. As the King's confessor, the Chancellor had the responsibility of guiding the King's conscience and would, if he thought it appropriate, transmit the request to the King for judgment in his council. In other countries, the judges themselves could supply the required remedy by prohibiting the abuse of a right or fraud, or by applying the principle of public order and good morals; such remedies were possible on the European continent within the very framework of the legal principles. In England, however, the royal courts did not have same freedom of action because they had never had the same general jurisdiction and were bound to observe rigid procedures. This recourse to the royal prerogative, perfectly justifiable and unopposed so long as it remained exceptional, could not fail to give rise to a conflict when it became institutionalized and developed into a system of legal rules set up in opposed to the common law.Gradually request for intervention by the Chancellor became more frequently; the practice became institutionalized. At the time of the Wars of the Roses (1453-1485), the Chancellor became a more and more autonomous judge deciding alone in the name of King and his council. Decisions were made on the basis of “the equity of the case.” Equitable doctrines grew out of the chancellor’s decisions. These worked to add to and correct the legal principles applied by the royal courts.After 1529, the Chancellor no longer served as confessor to the sovereign and was not an ecclesiastic but examined the petitions addressed to him as a real judge and observed a written procedure inspired by Canon law. The substantive principles he applied were also largely taken from Roman law and Canon law rather than the
相关推荐
— 没有更多了 —
以下为对购买帮助不大的评价