消息首页搜索举报

现货Jurisprudence and Persuasion: You Can''t Argue Like That"" A Case-based Approach (American Casebook Series)[9780314281272]

2075 九五品

仅1件

上海宝山

认证卖家担保交易快速发货售后保障

作者Ralph G. Steinhardt,Benjamin Teich

出版社West Academic Publishing

ISBN9780314281272

出版时间2018-07

装帧精装

纸张其他

页数277页

正文语种英语

上书时间2023-08-15

环球外文图书专营店

已实名已认证进店收藏店铺

在售商品暂无
平均发货时间 57小时
好评率暂无

最新上架

现货 Concise Numerical Mathematics ¥1175.00

现货 Secondary Cohomology Operations ¥1175.00

现货 Introduction to Smooth Ergodic Theory ¥1175.00

现货 Commutative Algebra ¥1175.00

现货 Homological Methods in Commutative Algebra : 234 ¥1175.00

现货 Modern Classical Homotopy Theory ¥725.00

现货 Advanced Modern Algebra : Part 2 ¥780.00

现货 Inverse Problems for Fractional Partial Differential Equations ¥725.00

现货 Ricci Solitons in Low Dimensions ¥1175.00

商品详情

品相描述：九五品

商品描述: This innovative book offers a case-based approach to arguments about the nature of law and persuasion. Its unifying insight is that every decided case has a theory or philosophy within it – whether acknowledged or not – and that there is professional value in developing the skill to discern, articulate, and analyze it. Offering a flexible platform for either an introduction to law and legal reasoning or an in-depth course in jurisprudence and advocacy, the book works first through decided cases and then offers context and depth through the writings of jurists and philosophers. Major themes in the cultural and intellectual history of the law are made accessible and always with a sense of what practical difference they make.Part I enables students to use case analysis to connect with some of the traditional and contemporary schools of jurisprudence across the ideological spectrum (e.g., natural law, positivism, legal realism, law and economics, feminist legal theory, and critical race theory). Part II, in a modern riff on what prior generations of lawyers would have called – without irony or deprecation – 'rhetoric,' analyzes certain identifiable and recurring types of legal arguments, including reasoning by default (e.g., fictions, presumptions, and burdens), recurring fallacies (e.g., begging the question, arguments ad hominem, asserting the consequent), and the nested problems of interpreting statutes and the common law. Understood as the art of argument, it is exactly what lawyers do. Honing it and keeping it respectable is in every law professor’s job description. Part III applies the skills and insights from the rest of the book by applying them in a particular setting, focused on the question whether international law really 'law' and what turns on that designation.