目录 1.1.1 Motivation of this study 1.1.1.1 Sterility of structuralist studies of language 1 . 1 . I .2 Limitations of Z. S. Harris s Discourse Analysis 1.1.2 Insufficiency of Hallidays exploration of context and text 1.1.3 Significance of this current study 1.2Research Methodology 1 .3 Collection and selection of corpora 1 .3. 1 Data collection and selection 1.3.2 Justification for the adoption of spoken prose as corpora 1.3.3 Transcription of real-life spoken data 1.4 Theoretical framework of this study 1 .5 Structure of this research Chapter 2 Literature Review on Context of and Text 2. I Introductory remarks 1 2.2.1 Context defined by different linguists 2.2.1. I Malinowskis definition of context 2.2.1.2 J. R. Firths definition of context 2.2.1.3 Halliday and Hasans notion of context 2.2.1.4 Roman Jacobsons definition of context 2.2.1.5 D. Hymes s definition of context 2.2.1.6 Elinor Ochss definition of context 2.2.1.7 CHEN Wangdaos definition of context 2.2.2 Cognitive context 3 2.2.2.1 Philosophers statement of obj ective context andcognitive context 2.2.2.2 Context in cognitive linguistics 2.2.2.3 Problems with the theory of cognitive context 2.3 Text 2.3. 1 Text, discourse, conversation 2.3.1.1 van Dijks definition of text and discourse 2.3.1.2 Halliday and Hasans definition of text 2.3.1.3 Brown and Yules definition of discourse and text 2.3.1.4 Beaugrande and Dresslers definition of text 2.3.1.5 Coulthards definition of discourse 2.3.1.6 Fowlers notion of text and discourse 2.4 Text and Context in this research 2.4.1 Text in this research 2.4.1.1 Informativity 2.4. 1 .2 Semantic compatibility 2.4.1.3 Associability 2.4.1.4 Cognitivity 2.4.1.5 Length felicity 2.4.2 Context in this research Chapter 3 Impact of Field upon Text 3.1 Introductory remarks 3.2 Field and its components 3.2.1 Suzanne Egginss description of field 3.2.2 Leckie-Tarrys description of field 3.2.2.1 Arena/activities 5 3.2.2.2 Participants 3.2.2.3 Semantic domain. 3.2.3 A brief summary 3.3 The impact of field upon text 3.3.1 The impact of subj ect matter upon text 3.3.2 The impact ofparticipants upon text 3.3.3 The impact of setting upon text 3.3.3.1 Conversation inside the classroom 3.3.3.2 Conversation outside the classroom 3.4 Summary Chapter 4 Impact of Tenor upon Text 4. I Introductory remarks 4.2 Different definitions of tenor 4.2.1 Gregorys definition of tenor 4.2.1.1 Personal tenor 4.2.1.2 Functional tenor 4.2.2 Poyntons definition of tenor 4.2.2.1 Power 4.2.2.2 Contact 4.2.2.3 Affective involvement 4.2.3 Martins definition of tenor 4.2.3.1 Status 4.2.3.2 Contact 4.2.3.3 Affect 4.2.4 Leckie-Tarrys definition of tenor 4.2.4.1 Formality 4.2.4.2 Role 4.2.4.3Focus 4.3 Impact of tenor upon text 4.3.1 Impact of power upon text 4.3.2 Impact of contact upon text 1 4.3.3 Impact of affective involvement upon text 1 1 Chapter 5 Impact of Mode upon Text 5. 1 Introductory remarks 1 1 5.2 Definitions of mode 5.2. 1 Hallidays definition of mode 5.2.2 Leckie-Tarrys definition of mode 11 5.2.2.3 Contextualization 5.2.3 Martins definition of mode 5.2.3.1 Spatial/interpersonal distance &
以下为对购买帮助不大的评价