英文原版书 Democratic Peacebuilding: Aiding Afghanistan and other Fragile States Dr. Richard J. Ponzio (Author)
民主建设和平审查了冷战以来国际建设和平的演变，确定了限制国际行为者在饱受战争蹂躏的社会中实现民主权威和法治制度化的因素。它特别关注阿富汗的《波恩协定》进程（2001-2005年）和波恩后时期（2006-2009年），在这期间，该国的多个国家，相互竞争的权力形式（如宗教领袖、部落长老、民兵指挥官和技术官僚）挑战了建立植根于民主规范和法治的“现代”形式政治权力的努力。
￥ 320 九品
仅1件
北京房山
认证卖家担保交易快速发货售后保障
作者Dr. Richard J. Ponzio (Author)
出版社Oxford University Press
ISBN9780199594955
出版时间2011
装帧精装
开本24*16.2
页数298页
货号ER-37
上书时间2021-12-20
- 店主推荐
- 最新上架
商品详情
- 品相描述：九品
- 商品描述
- Democratic Peacebuilding examines the evolution of international peacebuilding since the cold war, identifying the factors that limit the progress of international actors to institutionalize democratic authority and the rule of law in war-shattered societies. It gives particular attention to Afghanistan's Bonn Agreement process (2001-2005) and post-Bonn period (2006-2009), in which the country's multiple, competing forms of authority (e.g., religious leaders, tribal elders, militia commanders, and technocrats) challenged efforts to create "modern" forms of political authority rooted in democratic norms and the rule of law. Despite the significant risks involved, this volume argues that the institutionalization of democratic legal authority can create the conditions and framework necessary to mediate competing domestic interests and to address the root causes of a conflict peacefully. At the same time, one overlooked problem of international peacebuilding stems from the divergent conceptions, between international officials and the local population, of authority and its sources of legitimacy. By helping a conflict-affected society reconcile the inherent tensions between competing forms of authority, international peacebuilders can contribute to improved conditions for governance and a reduction in intra-state political violence. Due to high expenditures in a period of global economic uncertainty and frustrations in Afghanistan and elsewhere, democratization as an approach to conflict management and resolution is in retreat in some influential policy circles. But it is only a deepening of democracy, rather than lowering the metrics for progress and conditions for exit, that will determine whether fragile states are placed on a viable course toward stability and greater self-sufficiency.
相关推荐
— 没有更多了 —
以下为对购买帮助不大的评价