【现货速发】博鳌亚洲论坛亚洲竞争力2015年度报告（英文版） [Boao Forum for Asia Asian Competitive
全新正版书籍，24小时发货，可开发票。
￥ 75 4.7折 ￥ 160 全新
库存6件
天津津南
认证卖家担保交易快速发货售后保障
作者林桂军 著
出版社对外经贸大学出版社
ISBN9787566312846
出版时间2015-03
装帧平装
开本其他
定价160元
货号23679454
上书时间2024-12-24
![【现货速发】儿童尺牍及礼仪书 [3-6岁]](https://www0.kfzimg.com/sw/kfz-cos/kfzimg/efbaabab/36b191a3e88f28cb_s.jpg)
商品详情
- 品相描述：全新
- 商品描述
-
导语摘要
《博鳌亚洲论坛亚洲竞争力2015年度报告(英文版)》内容简介：报告认为，2014年度亚太经济体综合竞争力评估指数排名显示，“亚洲四小龙”继续领先，新加坡、中国香港、韩国和中国台湾分列前4位。中国在37个经济体中的排名较2013年度没有变化，其综合评估仍排在第9位。报告指出，为了客观、科学地评估亚洲企业竞争力情况，限于各企业相关数据的可获得性，我们把评估对象设定为亚洲上市企业。
目录
Preface
Part One Annual Report 2015—Competitiveness of Asian Economies
Chapter I Internal and External Environments Affecting the Competitiveness of Asian Economies
1.1 The Competitiveness of Asian Economies Is Faced with such Global Economic Situation： the Recovering Momentums of Developed Economies Vary Significantly with Their Monetary Policies Diversified Accordingly
1.2 The Asian Economy Is Significantly Slowing Down with Varied Conditions in Different Economies within the Region
1.3 China Economy's"New Normal"Becoming Key Factors of Asia Economy's Outlook and Competitiveness
1.4 Asia's Economic Outlook in 2015
Chapter 2 The New Trends and Influence of Multilateral Mechanism in Asia
2.1 The 22nd APEC Economic Leaders' Declaration in Beijing Sets the Direction for Regional Economic Cooperation in Asia
2.2 Prospects ofthe"Belt and Road Initiatives".
2.3 The Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank and the BRICS Development Bank will Serve as New Platforms for the Multilateral Mechanism in Asia
2.4 Economic Cooperation among China，Japan and Korea Affects the Overall Economic Competitiveness in Asia
Chapter 3 Evaluation Report on Competitiveness of Asian Economies
3.1 2014Target Economies to Be Evaluated
3.2 Comprehensive Competitiveness Ranking and Sub—Item Ranking in 2014
3.3 Analysis of the Evaluation Results of Asian Economies Competitiveness 2014
Part Two Annual Report 2015—Competitiveness of Listed Asian Enterprises
Chapter 4 Asian Enterprises' External and Internal Economic Environments
4.1 A Further Worsened Traditional Market Environment for Asian Enterprises
4.2 The Innovative Environment of Asian Enterprises Is at Distinct Disadvantages
4.3 The Distinct Suppression of Excess Production Capacity towards the Competitiveness Improvement of Asian Enterprises
4.4 The Financial Environment of Asian Enterprises Is Undergoing Structural Changes
Chapter 5 Report on Competitiveness of Listed Asian Enterprises 2015
5.1 Selected Listed Asian Enterprises
5.2 Evaluation Results and Related Analysis of Listed Asian Enterprises
5.3 Results and Analysis of Sub—Item Evaluation of Listed Asian Enterprises' Competitiveness
5.4 Evaluation of Asia's Listed Banking and Insurance Enterprises
Chapter 6 Competitiveness of Listed Asian Enterprises—Rankings
6.1 Rankings 2014 by Comprehensive Capacity： Listed Asian Enterprises'Competitiveness（300）
6.2 Rankings 2014 by Categories： Listed Asian Enterprises'Competitiveness（4×50）
6.3 Rankings 2014 by Regions： Listed Asian Enterprises'Comprehensive Competitiveness（6×50）
6.4 Rankings 2014 by Industries： Listed Asian Enterprises'Comprehensive Competitiveness（22×20）
Appendix 1 Introduction to Competitiveness Indices of Asian Economies
Appendix 1.1 Purpose and Target of Evaluation and Adjustments
Appendix 1.2 Introduction to Competitiveness Indices of Asian Economies
Appendix 1.3 Introduction to Competitiveness Indicators of Asian Economies
Appendix 2 Introduction to Competitiveness Indices of Listed Asian Enterprises
Appendix 2.1 Principles of Establishing the Competitiveness Evaluation Indicators System of Listed Asian Enterprises
Appendix 2.2 Introduction to the Competitiveness Indices of Listed Asian Enterprises
Appendix 2.3 Introduction to Competitiveness Evaluation Indices of Banking and Insurance Enterprises Listed in Asia
Appendix 2.4 Calculation Method of Competitiveness Indices of Listed Asian Enterprises
References
Acknowledgements
内容摘要
《博鳌亚洲论坛亚洲竞争力2015年度报告(英文版)》内容简介：报告认为，2014年度亚太经济体综合竞争力评估指数排名显示，“亚洲四小龙”继续领先，新加坡、中国香港、韩国和中国台湾分列前4位。中国在37个经济体中的排名较2013年度没有变化，其综合评估仍排在第9位。报告指出，为了客观、科学地评估亚洲企业竞争力情况，限于各企业相关数据的可获得性，我们把评估对象设定为亚洲上市企业。
— 没有更多了 —
以下为对购买帮助不大的评价