保正版！修辞问句与关联理论杨志霞 著9787313190666上海交通大学出版社
保证全新正版！百分之70城市次日达！7天无理由,16点之前基本当天发, 可开票,假一罚十.
￥ 46.45 6.1折 ￥ 76 全新
仅1件
北京朝阳
认证卖家担保交易快速发货售后保障
作者杨志霞 著
出版社上海交通大学出版社
ISBN9787313190666
出版时间2018-04
四部分类子部>艺术>书画
装帧平装
开本16开
定价76元
货号1201698813
上书时间2024-06-30
- 最新上架
商品详情
- 品相描述：全新
- 商品描述
-
目录
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research back ground
1.2 Research objectives
1.3 Outlines of the current study
Chapter 2 Literature review
2.1 Previous definitions and features of RQs
2.2 Previous distinction between RQs and other question types
2.3 Previous identification of RQs by linguistic indicators and context
2.4 Previous studies on functions of RQs
2.5 Previous studies on the two genres involved in the current study
2.6 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical framework— Relevance Theory
3.1 Speech Act Theory
3.2 Gricean Maxims vs. neo-Griceans and post-Griceans
3.3 The major concepts in Relevance Theory
3.4 Summary of claims in Relevance Theory
3.5 Interpretation of interrogatives in Relevance Theory
3.6 Interpretation of ‘figurative’ language in Relevance Theory
3.7 Interpretation process of an utterance in Relevance Theory
Chapter 4 Methodology in the current study
4.1 Methodological procedure of the current study
4.2 Brief introduction to corpus linguistics and the corpora used in the current study
4.3 Extracting questions from the two genres
4.4 Criterion for identifying and interpreting an RQ in the current study
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Applying analysis categories：question types for inclusion or exclusion
5.1 Cases excluded from the current study
5.2 Distinguishing RQs from other question types in the data
5.3 Analysis of RQ categories
5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Analysis of RQs in American and British campaign speeches
6.1 Theoretical considerations of Speech Act Theory and Gricean Principle in accounting for political RQs
6.2 Use of RQs rather than direct assertions in political speeches
6.3 Identification and interpretation of political RQs with linguistic indicators in terms of Relevance Theory
6.4 Identification and interpretation of political RQs without linguistic indicators in terms of Relevance Theory
6.5 RQs with explicit answers provided in political speeches
6.6 RQs not observing polarity shift in political speeches
6.7 RQs containing other rhetorical devices in political speeches
6.8 Summary
Chapter 7 Analysis of RQs in newspaper editorials
7.1 Theoretical considerations of Speech Act Theory and Gricean Principle in accounting for editorial RQs
7.2 Mode-related differences between RQs in political speeches and newspaper editorials
7.3 Identification and interpretation of editorial RQs with linguistic indicators in terms of Relevance Theory
7.4 Identification and interpretation of editorial RQs without linguistic indicators in terms of Relevance Theory
7.5 RQs with explicit answers provided in editorials
7.6 RQs not observing polarity shift in editorials
7.7 RQs containing other rhetorical devices in editorials
7.8 RQs serving as titles or subtitles in newspaper editorials
7.9 Summary
Chapter 8 Conclusions
8.1 Background to the current study
8.2 Summary of the discussion throughout the current study
8.3 Summary of contributions to the field of RQ study
8.4 Limitations，applications and avenues for future research
References
Appendices
Index
内容摘要
本书为“当代外语研究论丛”之一，调查了英国国家语料库(BNC)中优选频的50个身体部位词作为修辞性词素（概念隐喻）出现的3378类复合词，量化分析了其在英语复合词靠前位置和第二位置的分布规律。分析发现四种不同的语义属性与两个位置之间具有显著的相关性，这说明英语修辞复合词释义具有一定结构基础。因此，概念隐喻除了普通认知规律以外，还体现了具体语言结构的相对性。
— 没有更多了 —
以下为对购买帮助不大的评价